METHODS OF TREATING KERATIN HYPERPROLIFERATION DISORDERS USING mTOR INHIBITORS

ABSTRACT

A method of treating or preventing keratin hyperproliferation skin disorders is set forth. The method includes the administration of an mTOR inhibitor to a subject afflicted with the hyperproliferation disorder. The mTOR inhibitor can be administered to the subject via any means known in the art including oral, topical, and transdermal administration.

PRIORITY INFORMATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/963,137, filed Dec. 8, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/985,850, filed Nov. 16, 2007, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,205,080, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/866,161, filed Nov. 16, 2006, each of which are herein incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND

Keratin hyperproliferation disorders afflict a large number of individuals. Most of these disorders have no cure and the treatments primarily focus on amelioration of the symptoms of the disorders. As such research continues to discover methods of treatment for these diseases.

SUMMARY

The present invention is drawn to a method of treating or preventing keratin hyperproliferation skin disorders in a subject. The method includes administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of an mTOR inhibitor.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows an overview of mTOR signaling in mammals mammals (figure modified from K. Yonezawa, Mol Interv., 2003). The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key modulator of signal transduction leading to efficient translation of certain classes of messenger RNAs including those that contain a terminal oligopyrimidine (TOP) regulatory motif. In the proposed model, rapamycin blocks signal transduction by binding to mTOR resulting in decreased translation of TOP mRNAs (including K6a according to the model proposed here) at the level of ribosome initiation, resulting in decreased K6a protein synthesis.

FIG. 2 shows a comparison of the sequences of the 5′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of the common keratins including the inducible keratins K6a, K6b, K16 and K17. The location and presence of terminal oligopyrimidine (TOP) elements in the inducible keratins are shown in yellow. The lack of a TOP element does not mean it does not exist but rather may reflect the lack of proper identification of the 5′ end of the messenger RNA. For example, immediately upstream of the human K6b 5′ terminal “c” residue is the sequence cttctcctccctctg (see NCBI accession #L42584), suggesting it is also a TOP mRNA and the sequence listed may not contain the full-length 5′ UTR. It should be noted that the regulatory pyrimidine element need not be at the terminus of the 5′UTR in order to be functional (see Kasper et al., J. Biol. Chemistry, 1992).

FIGS. 3A-3B show results of rapamycin treatment of human keratinocytes. FIG. 3A Panel 1 shows results by western blot analysis of the effect on K6 expression in human keratinocyte cells when treated with increasing concentrations of rapamycin and harvested. FIG. 3A Panel 2 shows quantitated values (from Panel 1) of K6a expression in human keratinocyte cells plotted against rapamycin concentrations. FIG. 3b Panel 1 shows a timecourse analysis of effect of rapamycin on the human keratinocyte. FIG. 3b Panel 2 shows quantitated values (from Panel 1) of the K6a expression in human kerotinocyte cells treated with rapamycin overtime.

FIGS. 4A-4D show treatment with rapamycin results in clinical improvement in three pachyonychia congenita patients. FIG. 4A shows pain measures, based on arbitrary pain levels on a 1-10 scale (10 most painful), reported as either the morning level (upon waking—therefore not as heavily influenced by daily activity (dots) or the running average of morning pain levels reported (18 datapoints averaged, line). FIG. 4B shows results from The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire which was utilized to assess the impact of rapamycin treatment on daily activities. The Y-axis DLQI data is inverted to allow easier visualization of increased quality of life. DLQI and trough levels are correlated (insert). FIG. 4C shows photographic before-and-after images of plantar hyperkeratosis, blisters and neurovascular structures. FIG. 4D shows magnification of the heel region of patent IPCRR #10 from FIG. 4C containing the neurovascular structures. Specifically, it shows how the rapamycin treatment resulted in the reduction or resolution of these painful regions (see arrows). The reduced hyperkeratosis observed may be at least partially due to the ability of the patient to trim calluses much deeper due to receding neurovascular structures and the associated decreased pain.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENT(S)

Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended.

As used herein, “subject” refers to a mammal having a keratin hyperproliferation disorder. In some aspects, such subject may be a human.

The term “keratin hyperproliferation disorders” refers to skin disorders in which the inducible keratins, K6a, K6b, K16, and K17, are overexpressed or inappropriately expressed. Non-limiting examples of such disorders include keratosis pilaris (including follicular hyperkeratosis), pachyonychia congenita, hyperhidrosis, warts, and calluses. Another example of such a skin disorder is psoriasis.

The term “mTOR inhibitor” refers to agents or compounds which are effective in inhibiting mTOR or an inhibitor of the mTOR signaling pathway. mTOR is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates translation and cell division. Examples of mTOR inhibitors include but are not limited to rapamycin (sirolimus) and its analogues and derivatives, temsirolimus, everolimus, the rapamycin prodrug AP-23573, AP-23481, the like, and combinations thereof.

As used herein, the term “inhibition of” or “silencing of” with respect to genetic expression refers to the absence of, or at least an observable decrease in, the level of protein (or protein activity) from a target gene.

As used herein, “effective amount” or “therapeutically effective amount” of a inhibitory agent refers to a sufficient amount of inhibitory agent to perform an intended task and achieve an intended result. For example, an effective amount of rapamycin may be an amount which is sufficient to silence expression a keratin gene. It is understood that various biological factors may affect the ability of a particular agent to perform its intended task. Therefore, an “effective amount” or a “therapeutically effective amount” may be dependent in some instances on such biological factors. Further, while the achievement of therapeutic effects may be measured by a physician or other qualified medical personnel using evaluations known in the art, it is recognized that individual variation and response to treatments may make the achievement of therapeutic effects a somewhat subjective decision. The determination of an effective amount is well within the ordinary skill in the art of pharmaceutical sciences and medicine.

As used herein, sequences, compounds, formulations, delivery mechanisms, or other items may be presented in a common list for convenience. However, these lists should be construed as though each member of the list is individually identified as a separate and unique member. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary.

Concentrations, amounts, and other numerical data may be expressed or presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such a range format is used merely for convenience and brevity and thus should be interpreted flexibly to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. As an illustration, a numerical range of “about 0.5 to 10 g” should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited values of about 0.5 g to about 10.0 g, but also include individual values and sub-ranges within the indicated range. Thus, included in this numerical range are individual values such as 2, 5, and 7, and sub-ranges such as from 2 to 8, 4 to 6, etc. This same principle applies to ranges reciting only one numerical value. Furthermore, such an interpretation should apply regardless of the breadth of the range or the characteristics being described.

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods, devices and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the invention, representative methods, devices, and materials are described below.

It has been discovered that the expression of the inducible keratins containing a translation regulatory motif (e.g. K6a and K17 and likely K6b and K16) can be selectively inhibited by mTOR inhibitors. Inappropriate expression of these keratins appears to be involved in a number of hyproliferation skin disorders including but not limited to psoriasis, keratosis pilaris, pachyonychia congenita, hyperhidrosis, warts, and calluses. It is believed that the mTOR inhibitors are effective against these inducible keratins because the mRNAs encoding these keratins contain within their 5′ untranslated regions translation regulatory sequences that usually begin with a “c” residue, followed by a track of pyrimidines (“c” or “u” residues) ranging from 4-14 nucleotides. Messenger RNAs having this type of initiation sequence are referred to as terminal oligoarimidine (or TOP) mRNAs.

In one embodiment of the present invention, a method of treating or preventing keratin hyperproliferation disorder is proposed. The method includes administering an amount of mTOR inhibitor to a subject suffering with a keratin hyperproliferation disorder. The mTOR inhibitors which can be used in the present invention include but are not limited to rapamycin (sirolimus) and its analogues and derivatives, temsirolimus, everolimus, the rapamycin prodrug AP-23573, AP-23481, and combinations thereof. In one embodiment the mTOR inhibitor is rapamycin. In another embodiment mTOR inhibitor is a combination of rapamycin and a second mTOR inhibitor.

The mTOR inhibitor can be administered in any method or mode known in the art, including oral, topical, injection, and transdermal administration. In one embodiment the mTOR inhibitor is administered transdermally. In another embodiment the mTOR inhibitor is administered orally. When the mTOR inhibitor is administered orally, it can be administered in an amount of from 2 mg/day to 20 mg/day. In one embodiment, the oral administration can be formulated to be delivered in a single oral dosage form. In another embodiment, the mTOR inhibitor can be administered via injection or intravenously. Administration by injection can be done at or near an area in which the keratin hyperproliferation is manifested. In another embodiment the mTOR inhibitor can be administered topically. In some situations it may be desirable to administer the mTOR both orally and either topically or transdermally. For example, in one embodiment, the mTOR inhibitor can be administered orally and transdermally. When the mTOR inhibitor is administered orally and by another method, the mTOR inhibitor administered orally can be the same or different than the mTOR inhibitor administered by the other method.

The treatment of a subject experiencing a keratin hyperproliferation disorder using an mTOR can reduce or eliminate symptoms and/or signs associated with the keratin disorder. In one embodiment, the treatment using the mTOR inhibitor can provide a reduction of a pain scores as measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (see Example 4) or other appropriate evaluation known in the art.

EXAMPLE 1 mTOR Signaling in Mammals

Regulation of inducible keratin gene expression is believed to occur post-transcriptionally, likely at the level of mRNA translation. Functional K6 and K16 mRNAs are found throughout normal epidermis but are not translated into protein. As most translational regulation is mediated through 5′ untranslated motifs (the inducible keratins may be regulated in a coordinate fashion), we performed a sequence comparison using published keratin mRNA sequences as well as genomic sequences. The transcriptional start site for human K6a was mapped by primer extension to a “C” residue, which is imbedded in a tract of 21 pyrimidines. The putative resulting transcript had seven pyrimidines at the 5′ end. Terminal oligopyrimidine (TOP) regulatory motifs (4-14 pyrimidines adjacent to 5′ cap site, are known to be responsible for regulation of a class of mRNAs (TOP mRNAs) at the level of mRNA translation in a growth-dependent fashion. Treatment with the macrolide rapamycin (sirulimus) was shown to specifically down-regulate TOP mRNA translation. Rapamycin binds to and inhibits mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), resulting in inactivation of p70 S6 kinase (p70^(S6K)) and activation of eIF-4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1), leading to decreased translation of TOP mRNAs. FIG. 1 shows the mTOR signaling pathway in mammals.

EXAMPLE 2 Comparison of Untranslated Regions of Keratins K6a, K6b, K16, and K17

A comparison of the 5′ untranslated regions of the inducible keratins (K6a, K6b, K16, and K17) publicly available in the NCBI GenBank database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank) identified human and murine K6a as well as human K17 as TOP mRNAs, each initiating with a “c” residue and containing the consensus oligopyrimidine tract at the 5′ terminus (see FIG. 2). It is likely that the other inducible keratins also contain this element as their expression may be regulated in a coordinate fashion. The lack of a TOP element for human K6b and K16 likely reflects that the 5′ untranslated regions of mRNAs are often not mapped accurately. As an example, immediately upstream of the reported 5′ terminus of K6b exists an oligopyrimidine track, within which is likely the initiation site of the mRNA (see FIG. 2). Furthermore, there is a pyrimidine motif consisting of 14 continuous “u” and “c” residues in the middle of the 5′ UTR of human K16, within which transcription may occur.

EXAMPLE 3 Rapamycin Treatment of Human Keratinocytes

In order to test the hypothesis that inducible keratins are members of the TOP mRNA family, human HaCaT keratinocytes were treated with rapamycin. In one portion of the experiment, HaCaT cells were treated with increasing concentrations of rapamycin and harvested at 96 h and the effect on K6 expression was monitored by western blot analysis. (FIG. 3A, Panel 1). Rapamycin effectively inhibited expression of the K6 keratin, with little or not effect on a control (Lamin A/C). As shown in FIG. 3A Panel 2, K6a expression was indeed inhibited in a dose dependent fashion at low rapamycin concentrations (IC50 of ˜1 nM).

A timecourse analysis of effect of rapamycin on the HaCaT keratinocytes was also performed. The HaCaT keratinocytes were treated with 10 nM rapamycin and harvested over a range of time points. At the indicated times, cells were harvested and lysed in SDS-PAGE loading buffer, subjected to denaturing SDS-PAGE analysis and electroblotted to nitrocellulose. (FIG. 3B, Panel 1). K5, K6, and K14 expression were detected by specific antibodies and visualized by the NBT/BCIP system. The timecourse analysis revealed that inhibition begins at about 36 h post-treatment and persists for at least 144 h (see FIG. 3B, panel 2).

EXAMPLE 4 Clinical Testing of Rapamycin in Subjects With Pachyonychia Congenita

A small number (n=3) of pachyonychia congenita patients, one female (IPCRR #10) with the K6a(N171K) mutation and two male PC patients (IPCRR #2 and #11) with the K16(N125D) mutation were identified through the International Pachyonychia Congenita Research Registry (www.pachyonychia.org). These patients were invited to participate in a three to five month off-label use of oral rapamycin (Rapamune®, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). Rapamycin was given in the standard fashion following typical recommendations for use as an adjunct therapy in renal transplantation. Prior to initiation of therapy a pregnancy test was performed in the female patient (she was on oral contraceptive prophylaxis) and all three patients received a pre-therapy evaluation including: cbc, CMP (sodium, potassium, chloride, carbon dioxide, anion gap, BUN, creatinine, glucose, ALT, AST, calcium, total protein, albumin, bilirubin), lipid panel (cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, VLDL), UA with microanalysis, PA and lateral chest x-ray. The starting dose was 2 mg per day and trough levels were obtained at steady state after 2 weeks. The dosage was increased every two weeks until trough levels reached a range of 9-12 ng/mL. Patients were re-evaluated for effects and side effects every two weeks and photographs of plantar calluses were taken to document their progress.

Laboratories were performed which included: rapamycin trough level, UA with microanalysis, cbc with differential, CMP, lipid panel, pregnancy test (patient 10 only). Under the same WIRE protocol, patients also completed a daily pain diary rating their level of pain on a scale of 1-10 several times per day and a bi-weekly well-validated life quality evaluation (DLQI) at the time of their clinic visit. The patient with the K6a mutation collected callus shavings during her usual grooming routine prior to, during, and after treatment with rapamycin. The shavings were placed immediately in RNALater (Ambion) and RNA was extracted for future quantitative real-time quantitative PCR (RT qPCR) analysis of keratin expression.

Patient reported pain (morning assessment) and DLQI quality of life scores were plotted over time and with respect to dose of drug received and trough level over that time period. (see FIGS. 4A and 4B). Patients IPCRR #10, 2, and 11 received rapamycin for 156, 109, and 56 days, respectively, with maximal trough levels of 10.4, 12.5, and 11.3 ng/mL, respectively, and with maximal doses of 8 mg/day, alternating 2 mg and 3 mg on consecutive days, and 4 mg/day, respectively. All patients experienced a side effect that ultimately resulted in discontinuation of use of the drug. Patient 10 developed diarrhea and aphthous ulcers, patient 2 developed gastrointestinal distress with loss of appetite, and patient 11 developed an acneiform follicular eruption. None of the patients experienced any laboratory abnormalities or serious side effects. Significantly, in spite of these side effects arising from systemic administration of rapamycin, all three patients reported an increased quality of life (as reflected by decreasing DLQI score, note inverted axis in FIG. 4B) that paralleled the rapamycin trough level. As might be expected, the subjective pain scale was more variable than the DLQI scores, but as a general trend, the lower pain scores corresponded to higher trough levels. Of particular note for patient 10 is the discontinuation of rapamycin (days 145-148 due to concerns regarding diarrhea while traveling) during which time a trough level was not obtained. This period was associated with high level of pain followed by decrease of pain level when drug treatment was re-initiated and assumed to reach therapeutic levels (trough level was not obtained). The simple pain scale used in this study was not as good as the DLQI in adequately capturing the overall subjective experience of pain in these patients, especially patients 2 and 11. Both of these patients reported that they felt their pain was improved, but the pain scores did not reflect their general impression. These patients reported that this was due in part to the increased level of activity that spontaneously occurs when pain decreases. An improved pain scale is currently under development, which incorporates activity level into the subjective reporting system.

In addition to subjective improvement of plantar pain and improved quality of life, patients also demonstrated important clinical changes in the plantar calluses. FIG. 4C shows photographs taken of the plantar keratoderma before initiation of systemic rapamycin therapy and 12 weeks into the treatment course. The photographs demonstrate decreased keratoderma following treatment, particularly in the K6a PC patient. Of note, this patient has long noted that the level to which she is able to remove callus is determined by the level at which the blade reaches capillaries and associated pain fibers. At the 12 week time point, the depth at which these neurovascular structures were found appeared to be regressed relative to baseline (see FIG. 4D).

EXAMPLE 5 Treatment of Keratin Hyperproliferation Using Temsirolimus

A subject suffering from a keratin hyperproliferation disorder is administered a therapeutically effective oral dose of temsirolimus (TORISEL™) for a period of about 120 days. During the time of treatment, the subject's pain and keratoderma associated with the keratin hyperproliferation disorder are reduced.

While the forgoing examples are illustrative of the principles of the present invention in one or more particular applications, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications in form, usage and details of implementation can be made without the exercise of inventive faculty, and without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the claims set forth below. 

1. A method of treating psoriasis in a subject comprising: administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of an mTOR inhibitor selected from the group consisting of rapamycin (sirolimus), a rapamycin derivative, a rapamycin prodrug, and combinations thereof.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the rapamycin derivative is a member selected from the group consisting of: temsirolimus, everolimus, and combinations thereof.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the rapamycin prodrug is selected from the group consisting of AP-23573, AP-23481, and combinations thereof.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the mTOR inhibitor is rapamycin.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the mTOR inhibitor is a combination of two or more mTOR inhibitors.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of the mTOR inhibitor is oral.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the mTOR inhibitor is administered in an amount from about 2 mg/day to about 20 mg/day.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of the mTOR inhibitor is topical.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of the mTOR inhibitor is transdermal.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of the mTOR inhibitor is intravenous.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of the mTOR inhibitor is both oral and topical.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the mTOR inhibitor administered orally is the same as the mTOR inhibitor administered topically.
 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the mTOR inhibitor administered orally is different from the mTOR inhibitor administered topically.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the administration of the mTOR inhibitor is both oral and transdermal.
 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the mTOR inhibitor administered orally is the same as the mTOR inhibitor administered transdermally.
 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the mTOR inhibitor administered orally is different from the mTOR inhibitor administered transdermally.
 17. The method of claim 1, wherein psoriasis results from an overexpression or inappropriate expression of a keratin encoded by a mRNA having a terminal oligopyrimidine (TOP) motif. 